John
Hagee's Apostasy: A Case in Point About Evangelical Zionst
Errors
Demonstrating where bad hermeneutics and theology lead, plus
evidence of a continued
conspiracy against historic Orthodox
Christianity...
By: Jay Dyer
Pastor John Hagee of the the large Cornerstone Church in San
Antionio, Texas has recently published a book, "In Defense of
Israel," in which he outlines in detail his own total apostasy from
the most basic of Christian beliefs--that Christ was the Messiah!
See our posted video where he states it plain as day. But what is
the root of this problem? I say several things. Aside from his own
dubious character and obvious bad will, the cause can be found in
bad hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is the science of interpretation--how
we interpret he texts of Sacred Scripture. When I saw Hagee on Glenn
Beck a couple weeks ago talking about Israel non-stop, I knew
something was going on. I used to use John Hagee's "Prophecy Study
Bible," in fact, several years ago in my evangelical days, so I can
speak from experience concerning Hagee (also having read some of his
books and watched his "prophecy" lectures).
Let's examine some errors of the false hermeneutic of the
premillennialists and evangelicals. The first error this entire
system is built upon is the idea that Israel is still God's chosen
covenant nation. God's promises to Abraham's descendants were purely
literal and never able to be revoked, this view holds. God is bound
in his eternal love to the literal nation of Israel, even though
they have rejected Christ for the most part for the past 2000 years.
However, historic orthodox Christianity has always taught that the
Church of Christ is the New Israel, the true bride of Christ, that
faithfully keeps the testimony of Christ (Apoc. 12:17). Let's look
at some texts that show this point:
1. When we examine Christ's parable of the wicked vinedressers, we
see an explicit statement from our Lord concerning the possession of
the kingdom of God. Keep in mind, Hagee and all his evangelical
&liberal friends think God has never, in any sense, revoked the old
covenant with Israel, and that they are still the possessors or
future possessors of His kingdom:
Matt. 21: "33 “Hear another parable: There was a certain landowner
who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it, dug a winepress in
it and built a tower. And he leased it to vinedressers and went into
a far country. 34 Now when vintage-time drew near, he sent his
servants to the vinedressers, that they might receive its fruit. 35
And the vinedressers took his servants, beat one, killed one, and
stoned another. 36 Again he sent other servants, more than the
first, and they did likewise to them. 37 Then last of all he sent
his son to them, saying, ‘They will respect my son.’ 38 But when
the vinedressers saw the son, they said among themselves, ‘This is
the heir. Come, let us kill him and seize his inheritance.’ 39 So
they took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him.
40 “Therefore, when the owner of the vineyard comes, what will he
do to those vinedressers?” 41 They said to Him, “He will destroy
those wicked men miserably, and lease his vineyard to other
vinedressers who will render to him the fruits in their seasons.”
42 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:
‘ The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief
cornerstone. This was the LORD’s doing, And it is marvelous in our
eyes’?
43 “Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from
you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. 44 And whoever
falls on this stone will be broken; but on whomever it falls, it
will grind him to powder.” 45 Now when the chief priests and
Pharisees heard His parables, they perceived that He was speaking of
them. 46 But when they sought to lay hands on Him, they feared the
multitudes, because they took Him for a prophet."
The parable is quite clear, and is explained by our Lord Himself.
This was fulfilled when the Romans sacked Jerusalem in 70 A.D., and
destroyed the Temple and its administration. This was the definitive
end of the Old Testament dispensation, and fulfilled also the
predictions of Luke 21. In response to the Jews, Christ says the
kingdom of God will be taken from them because of the fact that they
are going to murder him. Christ states unequivocally that the
kingdom will be transferred to the Gentiles because of the rejection
of Christ by the Jews.
2. Our Lord commissioned the 12 Apostles to be the foundation stones
of the New Israel, replacing what St. Paul calls "flesh Israel" or
"Israel after the flesh."
Luke 22: "28 But you [Apostles] are those who have continued with Me
in My trials. 29 And I bestow upon you a kingdom, just as My Father
bestowed one upon Me, 30 that you may eat and drink at My table in
My kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of
Israel.”
So, our Lord has conferred upon the 12 the possession of the
kingdom, and it is they and their successors (Luke 10:16, 1 Tim.
1:3-4), who will sit on thrones judging in this spiritual kingdom.
Those who sit on these thrones are also their successors, the
Bishops of the Church. This is why St. Paul can write in Eph. 2:
"19 Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but
fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God,
20 having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets,
Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone, 21 in whom the
whole building, being fitted together, grows into a holy temple in
the Lord, 22 in whom you also are being built together for a
dwelling place of God in the Spirit."
3. Isn't it ironic that Hagee's church is named
"cornerstone." It
makes one wonder whether he meant Christ, the true cornerstone, or
the Masonic "cornerstone" ceremony performed by masons at the
erecting of a new lodge. And in case you think this is far fetched,
consider what wikipedia states about Hagee in the entry under his
name:
"Hagee was awarded the "Humanitarian of the Year" award by the San
Antonio B'nai B'rith Council. It was the first time in the history
of San Antonio that this award has been given to a Gentile. Dr.
Hagee was presented the ZOA Israel Award by U.N. Ambassador Jean
Kirkpatrick. This award was given by the Jewish Community of Dallas,
Texas. He was presented the ZOA Service Award by Texas Governor Mark
White. Houston Mayor Kathy Whitmire issued a special proclamation in
his honor declaring Pastor John C. Hagee Day. Hagee has received
numerous honors and accolades from national Jewish organizations for
his support of Israel."
For those that don't know, B'nai B'rith is Jewish Freemasonry. Could
Hagee be a Zionist agent? It seems so.
4. In response, it is the Catholic Church, and she alone, that is
the building of God, the temple of God, the New Jerusalem, that is
the kingdom of God built upon the foundation stones of all the
Apostles, and it is this kingdom which can never fall. She alone has
lasted 2000 years without changing her doctrines and without
committing massive apostasy. This is why we see the name of an
Apostle and the name of a tribe on each of the 12 foundation stones
of the New Jerusalem in St. John's Apocalypse (Apoc. 21). The
Cathoic Church has never repealed, though it has qualified the
meaning of the inspired words of St. Paul in 1 Thess. 2:
"14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which
are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things
from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, 15 who
killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have
persecuted us; and they do not please God and are contrary to all
men, 16 forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be
saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins; but wrath
has come upon them to the uttermost."
And Christ Himself has no fear of being labelled "anti-semitic"
(though He was, of course a semite!) when he calls Judaism a
"synagogue of Satan," in Apoc. 2:9 &3:9.
5. Is this racism? Anti-semitism? Absolutely not. Arabs are
"semites" as much as Jews, and there are and have been millions of
Arab Christians. What we are concerned with opposing here is an
occult, racist philosophy--Zionism, which is just as bad as "white
supremacy" or the Black Panthers' ideology. Only by being
incorporated into the God-man and His Body, the Church, can these
petty, fleshly divisions be overcome, as St. Paul writes in
Galatians 3:28-29. There we learn that the true descendants of
Abraham are those who operate with the faith of Abraham, not racist
pride. John Hagee is, in fact, the racist, who now worships the
nation of Israel. Without Christ, there is no salvation. The flesh
nation of Israel is cut off from the covenant and cannot attain to
heaven without faith in Jesus. Let us look at an important allegory
from St. Paul on this matter.
Galatians 4:
21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the
law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a
bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the
bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman
through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two
covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage,
which is Hagar— 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and
corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her
children— 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother
of us all. 27 For it is written:
“ Rejoice, O barren, You who do not bear! Break forth and shout,
You who are not in labor! For the desolate has many more children
Than she who has a husband.”
28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But,
as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who
was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless
what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son,
for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the
freewoman.” 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the
bondwoman but of the free."
6. So, you see, there are only two covenants, and there have only
ever been two covenants. One, symbolized by Mt. Sinai, which
represents Judaism, and which cannot give life to those who seek to
externally fulfill its precepts, and the New Covenant, which is the
eternal covenant (Heb. 13:20), confirmed in the counsels of the
Persons of the Trinity before the foundation of the world (Apoc.
13:8). This New Covenant is the covenant confirmed in Christ's
Blood, which is the Eucharist--celebrated at every Mass and Divine
Liturgy throughout the world (Luke 22:20 with Jer. 31:31). The Old
Testament saints themselves put their faith Christ--not in Judaistic
observances, as Jesus states in John 5:45-46, 8:56. Thus, He is the
only way for Jew and Gentile alike (Acts 4:12). And, He only has one
Church on earth that has faithfully maintained the traditions of the
Apostles, both in Word and in Epistle (2 Thess. 2:15).
Unfortunately, Hagee, like those who for a time believed in Christ
in the first century and fell away as the writer of Hebrews
mentions, Hagee has also has apostatized into Judaism because he is
blind to the Spirit of Christ operative in the Old Testament. In
other words, in this bad hermeneutic, one fails to understand
typology. This is why St. Paul writes:
"7 But if the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones, was
glorious [the Old Covenant], so that the children of Israel could
not look steadily at the face of Moses because of the glory of his
countenance, which glory was passing away, 8 how will the ministry
of the Spirit not be more glorious? 9 For if the ministry of
condemnation had glory, the ministry of righteousness exceeds much
more in glory. 10 For even what was made glorious had no glory in
this respect, because of the glory that excels. 11 For if what is
passing away was glorious, what remains is much more glorious. 12
Therefore, since we have such hope, we use great boldness of
speech— 13 unlike Moses, who put a veil over his face so that the
children of Israel could not look steadily at the end of what was
passing away. 14 But their minds were blinded. For until this day
the same veil remains uplifted in the reading of the Old Testament,
because the veil is taken away in Christ. 15 But even to this day,
when Moses is read, a veil lies on their heart. 16 Nevertheless when
one turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is
the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.
18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the
glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from
glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord."
What could be clearer? The Old Covenant has been brought to
fulfillment and fruition by the New. It (the Law alone) cannot save
(and never could), and those who still adhere to it as the proper
way to approach God are unfortunately blind to the types of Christ
which are found throughout the Law (Luke 24:44). Christ is the true
High Priest; Christ is the true Moses; Christ is the true inheritor
of the Abrahamic promises; Christ is the fulfillment of the promise
to David concerning a kingdom, and on and on. And, all of this is
actualized at Christ's First Advent--not at some fictitious, literal
millennial kingdom in Jerusalem or Illinois. Thus, the kingdom is
now (Col. 1:13), and it is the Church, and is ruled by His faithful
Bishops abnd priests (Matt. 16:18 with 18:18).
7. Consider the First Century writer, St. Clement of Rome, who was
ordained by St. Peter wrote:
"Through countryside and city [the apostles] preached, and they
appointed their earliest converts, testing them by the Spirit, to be
the bishops and deacons of future believers. Nor was this a novelty,
for bishops and deacons had been written about a long time earlier.
. . . Our apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that there
would be strife for the office of bishop. For this reason,
therefore, having received perfect foreknowledge, they appointed
those who have already been mentioned and afterwards added the
further provision that, if they should die, other approved men
should succeed to their ministry" (Letter to the Corinthians
42:4–5, 44:1–3 [A.D. 80]). That's "apostolic succession."
Or consider what St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, wrote in his
Letter to the Smyrneans (ca 100 A.D.):
"CHAPTER VIII.--LET NOTHING BE DONE WITHOUT THE BISHOP.
See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the
Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence
the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything
connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a
proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or
by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall
appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as,
wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not
lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a
love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also
pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and
valid."
St. Cyril of Jerusalem, in his Catechtical Lectures, Lectures 4 and
18, warns:
"Fall not away either into the sect of the Samaritans, or into
Judaism: for Jesus Christ henceforth has ransomed you. Stand aloof
from all observance of Sabbaths, and from calling any indifferent
meats common or unclean. But especially abhor all the assemblies of
wicked heretics; and in every way make your own soul safe, by
fastings, prayers, almsgivings, and reading the oracles of God; that
having lived the rest of your life in the flesh in soberness and
godly doctrine, you may enjoy the one salvation which flows from
Baptism; and thus enrolled in the armies of heaven by God and the
Father, may also be deemed worthy of the heavenly crowns, in Christ
Jesus our Lord, to Whom be the glory for ever and ever. Amen."
"25. Of old the Psalmist sang, Bless ye God in the congregations,
even the Lord, (ye that are) from the fountains of Israel. But after
the Jews for the plots which they made against the Saviour were cast
away from His grace, the Saviour built out of the Gentiles a second
Holy Church, the Church of us Christians, concerning which he said
to Peter, And upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates
of hell shall not prevail against it Matthew 16:18 . And David
prophesying of both these, said plainly of the first which was
rejected, I have hated the Congregation of evil doers; but of the
second which is built up he says in the same Psalm, Lord, I have
loved the beauty of Your house; and immediately afterwards, In the
Congregations will I bless you, O Lord. For now that the one Church
in Judea is cast off, the Churches of Christ are increased over all
the world; and of them it is said in the Psalms, Sing unto the Lord
a new song, His praise in the Congregation of Saints. Agreeably to
which the prophet also said to the Jews, I have no pleasure in you,
says the Lord Almighty Malachi 1:10; and immediately afterwards, For
from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same, My
name is glorified among the Gentiles. Concerning this Holy Catholic
Church Paul writes to Timothy, That you may know how you ought to
behave yourself in the House of God, which is the Church of the
Living God, the pillar and ground of the truth 1 Timothy 3:15 ."
St. Athanasius, in his First Festal Letter, Sec. 8, writes:
"8. Now observe; that city, since the coming of our Savior, has had
an end, and all the land of the Jews has been laid waste; so that
from the testimony of these things (and we need no further proof,
being assured by our own eyes of the fact) there must, of necessity,
be an end of the shadow. And not from me should these things be
learned, but the sacred voice of the prophet foretold, crying;
'Behold upon the mountains the feet of Him that brings good tidings,
and publishes peace Nahum 1:15;' and what is the message he
published, but that which he goes on to say to them, 'Keep your
feasts, O Judah; pay to the Lord your vows. For they shall no more
go to that which is old; it is finished; it is taken away: He is
gone up who breathed upon the face, and delivered you from
affliction.' Now who is he that went up? a man may say to the Jews,
in order that even the boast of the shadow may be done away; neither
is it an idle thing to listen to the expression, 'It is finished; he
is gone up who breathed.' For nothing was finished before he went up
who breathed. But as soon as he went up, it was finished. Who was he
then, O Jews, as I said before? If Moses, the assertion would be
false; for the people were not yet come to the land in which alone
they were commanded to perform these rites. But if Samuel, or any
other of the prophets, even in that case there would be a perversion
of the truth; for hitherto these things were done in Judea, and the
city was standing. For it was necessary that while that stood, these
things should be performed. So that it was none of these, my
beloved, who went up. But if you would hear the true matter, and be
kept from Jewish fables, behold our Savior who went up, and
'breathed upon the face, and said to His disciples, Receive the Holy
Ghost John 20:22.' For as soon as these things were done, everything
was finished, for the altar was broken, and the veil of the temple
was rent; and although the city was not yet laid waste, the
abomination was ready to sit in the midst of the temple, and the
city and those ancient ordinances to receive their final
consummation."
Similarly, the 8th Canon of the Seventh Ecumenical Council (787
A.D.) states:
"Since certain, erring in the superstitions of the Hebrews, have
thought to mock at Christ our God, and feigning to be converted to
the religion of Christ do deny him, and in private and secretly keep
the Sabbath and observe other Jewish customs, we decree that such
persons be not received to communion, nor to prayers, nor into the
Church; but let them be openly Hebrews according to their religion,
and let them not bring their children to baptism, nor purchase or
possess a slave. But if any of them, out of a sincere heart and in
faith, is converted and makes profession with his whole heart,
setting at naught their customs and observances, and so that others
may be convinced and converted, such an one is to be received and
baptized, and his children likewise; and let them be taught to take
care to hold aloof from the ordinances of the Hebrews. But if they
will not do this, let them in no wise be received."
In conclusion, bad theology leads to worse theology, and often this
is based in a faulty hermeneutic with false presuppositions. With
Hagee, its a serious failure to recognize Christ in the Old
Testament and typology. Both he and the Zionists are united in
rejecting the teaching of the historic Orthodox Fathers. Heresy is
like a virus that compounds itself. Premillennialism,
dispensationalism, and its offshoot, the virtual worship of Israel,
are serious errors that, when worked out to their illogical
conclusions, end up denying Christ's divinity and/or necessity of
faith in Him for salvation. Hagee demonstrates that.
Posted by Jay Dyer on November 08, 2007 at 05:12 PM in America --
re-posted by the webmaster of http://bloodonthealtar.tripod.com at
May 3, 2009.
(Msgr. Jouin, page 24,