Institute for Historical Review
The Psychology and Epistemology of 'Holocaust' Newspeak
Michael A. Hoffman II
"Holocaust" is a Newspeak word whose exact definition
exists, in the society of the spectacle, as a bundle of
images. It is recognized on the visceral rather than the
rational plane by its targeted audience. It does not exist
in the public mind as a specific event, but as a command
phrase summoning a sensory overload of images of piles
of naked bodies and persons with stars of David on their
coats being force-marched by gun-toting German soldiers.
How can any person say it didn't happen?
When Abba Eban's Civilization and the Jews TV series
installment on the "Holocaust" omitted any mention of
homicidal gas chambering -- the central event of the
history of Exterminationism -- there was no apparent
notice or comment among critics or the public. It was as
if NASA had produced a mini-series on the moon flights
without mentioning the rockets that carried the
astronauts, and no one even noticed.
The spectacular "Holocaust" has the quality of a myth
because it has an existence independent of its history.
Specific descriptions of a variety of actions, events and
principals having tremendous diversity in significance
and meaning have been absorbed into a single, narrow
category. Prior to the imposition of "Holocaust" Newspeak,
precise allusions and direct references were made to the
allegations at issue, as for example, the claim of six
million slaughtered Jews, mass murder by means of poison
gas, soap manufactured from human fat and so forth.
Now, under the aegis of "Holocaust" Newspeak, the
preceding allegations are combined into an aggregate which
includes the reality of National Socialist internment of
Jews in concentration camps, the "Kristallnacht," an
officially enshrined policy of anti-Semitism and the
displacement and death of hundreds of thousands of Jews as
a result of war-related combat, typhus and privation.
Which are upheld and which are denied when one is accused
of saying "the 'Holocaust' didn't happen"?
The masterstroke of the "Holocaust" cultists was to
imposea Newspeak slogan upon a combination of historical
realities and historical impostures, thereby achieving a
psychological and epismological device for condemning
researchers skepticalof homicidal gas chambering accounts
or human skin lampshades as deniers of the existence of
concentration camps, Hitlerian anti-Semitism and
persecutions; and the death and displacement of hundreds
of thousands of European Jews.
By exploiting this confusion, the Exterminationists can
depict persons who question even the wildest flights of
"Holocaust" S&M fantasy as lunatic nay-sayers to the
spectacular, overwhelming enormity of an entire era's
history when conveniently grouped under the Newspeak
The utility of Newspeak for the maintenance of an
indoctrinated mindset is glimpsed in the intriguingly
stubborn affinity many journalists have for the
"Holocaust" Newspeak agenda. With comical monotony,
reporters refuse to describe revisionists in terms of the
specific question they have about a specific event.
Instead, both the event and the questioner are located
within the artificial agenda of "Holocaust" Newspeak. By
continually refer ring to a researcher who doubts the
technology described for the Nazi gas chambers, for
example, as one who "says the 'Holocaust' didn't happen,"
the doubter is cleverly saddled with the enormous
connotations which are summoned in the public mind by the
invocation of a Newspeak buzz word. Suggesting that gas
chamber accounts might have been faked requires the
logical defense of that particular assertion. Being
presented to a conditioned audience as someone who says
the "Holocaust" is a fake, is tantamount to being
announced as one who proclaims a flat earth. As in any
cult, the doubting Thomas is not addressed in terms of his
specific doubts but as one who negates an entire
Newspeak obscurantism produces an iconic mental state
among the "Holocaust" cult's true believers which is
indistinguishable from that of the hypnotic because,
"Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the
range of thought. " (George Orwell, 1984 ).
The imposition of "Holocaust" Newspeak as the officially
prop er academic and journalistic term for German-Jewish
relations for the period from 1933-1945 is a
recentinnovation. As late as 1977, the "Holocaust" word
was written in the lower case, within quotation marks
("holocaust"), when used as an optional reference to the
experience of Jews in the Third Reich. In the middle of
the decade of the 1970's, dictionaries, encyclopedias,
textbooks and newspaper indexes were altered to
incorporate Newspeak, without any qualifiers, in
accordance with the demands of the Big Brother
Webster's Dictionary and Encyclopedia and the Funkand
Wagnall's Dictionary of the 1960's define holocaust as a
burntoffering on the part of pagans and Jews. By 1975,
however, "minitrue" has entered the New Columbia
Encyclopedia, which now defines holocaust as "a name given
to the period of persecution and extermination of European
Jews by the National Socialists, or Nazis."
A name given by whom? By whose authority was the fact of
persecution mixed together with the notion of
"extermination"? Who decided on this word's authoritative
application? How did it enter popular usage? Why
"Holocaust" with its nebulous reference to reality
(anti-Semitic persecution) as well as disputed claims
(extermination)? Why wasn't the word "Exterminationism"
chosen for official, dictionary-definition recognition?
The latter term accurately denotes a specific allegation,
that the Jewish people were "exterminated" during World
War II. Such a word does not depend upon ambiguous
connotations or confusing allusions to disparate events
for its utilityand validity. To be accused of denying
Exterminationism does not place the denier in the position
of a flat earthist nonsensically denouncing the massive
evidence of concentration camp internment and Jewish
casualties. To deny Exterminationism is to deny that Jews
were in fact exterminated. This is not much of a denial
since millions of Jews were alive at the end of the war.
The novocaine of the media ensures that no one asks these
reasonable and obvious questions. Linguists of the
caliber of Noam Chomsky and Orwell pontificators of the
stature of Cronkite and Moyers, accepted and even endorsed
the issuance of a license akin to the ecclesiastical
imprimatur for useas the exclusive referrent of one nation
Was World War Two itself a holocaust over-all, or does the
term have a proprietary relationship with Jews alone? How
is it that the atomic and thermite incineration of
approximately one million helpless German and Japanese
civilians, mostly women and children, in deliberate mass
murder firebombings by the Allied air forces, does not
rate as a holocaust?
Revisionists are forced to endure from the
Exterminationists a particularly chilling and grotesque
example of self-aggrandizement when revisionists are
accused of denyinga World War Two holocaust.
The overwhelming holocaust of the modern era, for which
there is all of the forensic proof the Jewish "Holocaust"
is supposedto contain and from which it is also intended
to distract, is the merci less Allied fire-bombing
holocaust against Hamburg, Berlin, Dresden, Tokyo,
Hiroshima, Nagasaki and dozens of other major civilian
The racism of the ethnocentric "Holocaust" cult is
confronted full force in the special criterion established
for the phrase "Holocaust survivor. " Such people are
always the victims of the National Socialists and are
mostly Jews. Human perception has been so impaired by this
cult category that Germans and Japanese who escaped death
in the unprecedented firestorms which transformed their
cities into pits of mass human incineration, are not
referred to as holocaust survivors.
A media-certified Jewish "survivor" of the one and only
"Holocaust" with a capital H symbolizes the pathetic
partisanship with which the entire epoch of the holocaust
that was World War Two as a whole is invested.
Revisionists do not deny the holocaust in the fully human
sense of that word. Let the TV cameramen and the
professors focus their attention on the mass burning of
hundreds of thousands of women and children in deliberate
Allied slaughters, and they too will come to realize the
degree to which Zionist racism and hatred of gentiles has
suppressed this holocaust to such a degree that it is
totally dismissed from discussion of the history of the
Second World War.
Hence, when revisionists question this or that aspect of
the Sho'ah theologian's theory about an expiational
Jewishinferno, it signals to the cultist that "the
'Holocaust' didn't happen. " The logic of the "Holocaust"
zealot permits the visualization of only Jewish suffering;
only Jews burning. If one says the gas chamber canon is
questionable, contradictory, possibly false, it must then
signify that one is saying the war was a picnic! The
cultist is incapable of understanding that German and
Japanese civilians suffered an unparalleled holocaust in
World War Two which is not being denied when revisionists
investigate Jewish claims; on the contrary, it is freed
for the first time from an imposed silence.
It is from a desperate need to take world attention away
from the authentic "burnt offerings" of that horrid war
that the traumatizing monomania of Jewish "Holocaust"
preoccupation has warped the conscience of the West.
Mt. Zion decrees, "The 'Holocaust' cannot be debated" and
in a sense this theological fiat is quite true. In free
and open debate, linguistic mystification would no longer
shield partisan generalizations and falsehoods. Charges
and assertions would have to stand on scientific and
forensic evidence alone. The diminishment of thought
Orwell pointed to with regard to Newspeak is noted in the
current circumstances surrounding investigation into the
numerous contradictions, discrepancies and outright absurd
ities in the claims made about homicidal gas chambers.
There are many aspects of the gas chamber claims which
deserve -- even demand -- critical, scholarly analysis.
Authentically sound historiography does not shrink from
such scrutiny but assists it with all the resources
available. Truth need not be protected beneath a shower of
fascist-baiting expletives and left-wing McCarthyist
smears about "anti-Semitism." Truth welcomes every
investigation and every manifestation of curiousity. In so
vast a study as the Jewish "Holocaust" claims can it
really be truthfully asserted that everyone troubled by
contradictions or questionable methods and testimony is
ipso facto a fiendish Jew-hater?
"Holocaust" Newspeak offers ample protection for hoaxes
through its suppressive linguistic mechanism. "Holocaust"
belief diminishes critical thinking because its authority
is not derived from having stood the traditional tests of
point-counterpoint debate and rigorously critical
exegesis, but from a ruling class monopoly-consensus
possessed of the ability to propound dogmatically before
large captive audiences.
The remarkable fact about the attack on revisionism by the
Exterminationist historians is that it has had very little
to do thusfar with history, but everything to do with
angry invective and Jewish moralizing.
Those who possess the authority to impose upon our
discourse partisan jargon disguised as objective
historical description havea tremendous impact on the
shaping of human perception, an impact thus far overlooked
in the study of the evolution of our beliefs about the
history of the Second World War.
In modern democracies we are supposedly encouraged to
question everything, from traditional religions revered by
our grandparents to the infinite themes of space and time,
but no "respect able" person is permitted by the
establishment to question how this "Holocaust" buzz-word
came to be applied, in its capitalized form, uniquely to
the situation of Jews in the Third Reich.
The West, in its penultimate secular-consumer phase,
wishes to uphold the concept that it alone among
contemporary and historical social and cultural models,
has no sacred dogmas or theology and therefore no
forbidden domains of intellectual inquiry and no heretics.
As we shall see, Exterminationism (an accurate description
for the ubiquitous conspiracy theory regarding Jews and
National Socialists), is as much of a sacred cow in North
America and Europe as Islam in Iran, Marxism-Leninism in
Albania or the Holy Ghost revival in Skunk Hollow,
Just as atheists and pagans were executed for denying the
existence of the devil in the 17th century, revisionists
are candidates for burning in the 20th century for denying
the devil theory of modern European history,
Menachem Begin and other Israeli government officials have
described the popular supermarket-tabloid fiend known by
the generic brand-name, "Nazi war criminal," as "satanic.
" This notion of the diabolic presupposes the angelic. The
one can do no right, the other can do no wrong. All such
witch crazes carry along with their vapeurs histeriques
the whiff of solicited murder.
The murder of the modern supermarket-satanist, the brand
name Nazi war criminal, is a hallmark of "Holocaust"
cultism taken to its illogical, but inevitable,
conclusion. In February,1973 Israeli agents beat to death
a former German soldier in the mistaken belief he was Dr.
Mengele, the witch of Auschwitz and convenient fantasy
projection for extant psychoses about Dr. Frankenstein.
In 1982, French witchfinder general Serge Klarsfeld paid a
Boliv ian assassin $5,000 to murder Klaus Barbie. 2
Despite this "peccadillo," Mr. Klarsfeld continues to
receive numerous encomiums from the "humane" and
"democratic" media establishment as a noble battler
against fascist barbarity. If the thoughtof nobility
somehow clashes in the reader's mind with the barbarous
fact of hiring assassins, and the repercussions possible
from encouraging this fellow's example by heaping lavish
public praise upon him, banish the thought. To do
otherwise is to flirt dangerously toward Jew-hating and
neo-Nazism. Keep in mind instead that we are dealing here
with angels who are above the law and demons to whom we
owe nothing; certainly not the rights of man that must
always be extended to Zionists under all circumstances.
Witchfinder Klarsfeld has adopted for his personal motto
an adage from the Ku Klux Klan. Rather than have a
satanist like Barbie walk free, Klarsfeld declared "It is
better to have an illegal resolution. "
The degree of fervor exhibited in the crusade against
devil-Nazis is that of almost total rage. It should come
as no surprise thata special category of fiend has been
reserved in the Israeli hell for an even worse species of
cretin. The lowest rung on the ladder of demonism is
occupied by revisionists. Speaking in what the Associated
Press described as a rare interview on Israeli army radio,
former Prime Minister Begin announced:
There is an attempt -- and even the word satanic cannot
describe its evilness -- to deny that six million Jews,
men, women, and children, were led by Nazi Germany and its
partners to the pits, to the poison-spewing trucks, to the
gas chambers, to the crematoriums. 3
If assassination and death bybeating are reserved for
satanic Nazis, what fate do the holy people have in store
for those for whom "even the word satanic" cannot describe
their evilness -- the revisionists?
Like the promulgation of a Papal Bull anathematizing
apostate deniers of the existence of the devil -- which
carried with it threats of execution -- the kingdom of the
"Holocaust" is upheld by dogmatic Israeli declaration in
the authoritative media monopoly, and woe to those who
fail to heed it.
Just as there was no material, scientific proof for the
existence of the devil, there is no material, scientific
proof for the existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers.
There are no autopsies available from any source showing
that even one Jew died as a result of Zyklon B
(hydrocyanic acid) poisoning, among the millions who are
alleged to have been killed in this manner, an esoteric
but revolutionary fact clumsily ad mitted by the
prestigious Exterminationist genie, Dr. Raul Hilberg. 4
The "Holocaust" cult's "proof" of gas chambers depends
upon precisely what the medieval witch cult depended upon
for its "proof" of the devil: confessions and
These cults do differ in one respect, however. To augment
the accounts of the witnesses who smelled the smoke and
saw the fire and brimstone of satan, the holy fungus of
the rye ergot was administered to create the necessary
hallucinatory vision. In our modern, spectacular society
the witnesses do not need drugs to report about the
"smoke" and the "flames" emitted by the satanic furnaces.
They have the marvelous fungus of television to augment
For example, in the movie The Wall giant crematorium
"smokestacks" belch massive clouds of evil-looking black
smoke and ash. It was scientifically impossible for the
crematoria in Auschwitz to emit smoke or ash, according to
the builder's pat ent by Topf and Son. In fact, no
crematoria produce these emissions. Cremation technology
was devised in the late 19th century specifically for the
purpose of suppressing the emissions which accompany
open-pit burning. There are no such things as crematorium
"smokestacks. " Cremation uses heat, not flame for
reduction of the corpse into ash and crematorium chimneys
emit heat and not smoke or flames.
Because there is no business like sho'ah business,these
technical facts have not had any influence on the
cinematic promoters of the myth. Since cultic true
believers do not permit scientific facts to get in the way
of religious "truth," and since the majority of Americans
are members of the"Holocaust" cult, there is very little
impetus for challenging movies like The Wall.
These fantasies about giant smoking furnaces are shown
repeatedly in 70 mm. and Dolby stereo constituting an
intensely hallucinogenic experience.
"You are there, in Auschwitz!" -- rather like the
increasingly sophisticated video simulators which let us
imagine we are piloting a starship past Orion.
The illusion is exceedingly slick. In the case of
Exterminationism, repeated exposure to falsified
portrayals of the concentration camps shape the "memories"
of former internees who did not witness what was depicted
in The Wall, but afterforty years cannot be too greatly
faulted for perhaps imagining that they did, after sitting
through a lifetime of graphic cinematic retellingsof what
they should have seen, according to the demandsof
The Jewish "Holocaust" has all the substance of a Grade B
horror flick recalling Swift:
Methinks when you expose the Scene, Down the ill-organ'd
Engines fall; Off fly the Vizards and discover all, How
plain I see thro' the Deceit! How shallow! and how gross
the cheat ... 5
The benandante wereagrarian mystics whose sorghum and
fennel agricultural rites had no connection to the
episcopal satan. Their ecstatic shamanism pre-dated the
advent of JudeoChristianity in Europe by several
centuries. When, in 1580, the activities of the benandante
were reported to the witchfindersof Friuli, Italy it was
decreed that benandante had to havebeen satanists because
there was no mention in the inquisitors manuals, such as
the Malleus Maleficarum, of a category of benign
In the modern witchfinder's manuals such as Charles
Higham's American Swastika or the appropriately named
Hammer (of Heretics) magazine published in association
with the Zionist Shmate society, Searchlight in England,
the intelligence sheets of the Anti-Defamation League of
B'nai B'rith (ADL) and the Simon Wiesenthal Center,
revisionists are never perceived as independent thinkers
or skeptical inquirers researching "Holocaust" anomalies
out of concern for historical integrity, but as satanists,
butchers, terrorists, anti-Semites, neo-Nazis and
perverts. For example, Lucy S. Dawidowicz, author of The
War Against the Jews, labels revisionists as "rabid,"
"neo-Nazi," "crackpot," "paranoid" and "oddball." 7 Elie
Wiesel, chairman of the U. S. Holocaust Commission, adds
the invectives "spiritually perverted" and "morally
deranged" to the list. 8
Because the benandante had no way of presenting theirviews
to the official circles of the Church andliterate
establishment elite, they were depicted solely from the
point of view of their accusers.
The best presentation of the case against the
Exterminationist theory, as of this writing, is Dr. Arthur
R. Butz's The Hoax of the 20th Century, a brilliant tour
de force of research and critical analysis. Importing or
possessing the book in Canada, the Federal Republic of
Germany, Israel and South Africa may result in arrest and
imprisonment. In the U.S., it is informally banned from
college course work, bookstores and most libraries. Those
libraries which do stock it usually keep it off the
shelves in inter-library loan.
Those who dare to read the book or make it available to
students and the public on the civil libertarian basis of
the people's rightto know and judge for themselves, will
be smeared as Nazi sympathizers and persons spreading
poison in the community. This argumentum ad hominem will
be given by bourgeois journalists and academics who have
not even read the book, but who are content to accept the
infallible word of the "Holocaust" cult's popes and
popesses that the book is profoundly demonic.
Without recourse to a fair hearing before the episcopate
and aristocracy, the indigenous benandante were
transformedinto the classic Biblical image of satan.
Similarly, in the face of modern censorship and
repression, grotesque distortions and patent stupidities
are presented to 20th century audiences as "what
revisionists say. " Lucy S. Dawidowicz:
Butz -- anassociate professor of electrical engineering
and computer sciences -- was convinced that all the Jews
said to have been murdered were still alive and he
undertook to prove it, his expertise in computers no doubt
standing him in good stead. 9
This is what Dr. Butz actually wrote:
The Jews of Europe suffered during the war by being
deported to the East, by having had much of their property
confiscated and, more importantly, by suffering cruelly in
the circumstances surrounding Germany's defeat. They may
have even lost a million dead ... Himmler was given the
power to "act independentlyupon his own responsibility. "
Everybody knew that that meant executions of partisans and
persons collaborating with partisans. The dirt y task was
assigned to four Einsatzgruppen ofthe SD ... the
Einsatzgruppen must have shot many Jews, althoughwe do not
know whether "many" means 5,000, 25,000 or 100,000. 10
Miss Dawidowicz had apparentlynot even read the book by
the man she is bashing, and does not expect that her
readers have or will either.
If we are to believesome morally deranged and spiritually
perverted pseudo-historians, the Holocaust never took
place ... The Nuremberg trials, the Einsatzkommandotrials,
the Frankfurt trials were never held ... There was no
Treblinka,there was no Majdanek, there was no Birkenau ...
NorthwesternProfessor Arthur Butz calls it: "The hoax of
the century." 11
Dr. Butz on Nuremberg:
First there was the "big trial" conducted by the
"International Military Tribunal" (IMT) at Nuernberg
immediately after the war. This was the trial of top Nazis
G F6ring, Hess, Ribbentrop et al. which ran from November
1945 to October 1946. 12
Dr. Butz on Birkenau:
Thus, on the basis ofseniority and also on account of
quartering the Auschwitz SS administrative offices,
Auschwitz I was indeed the "main camp," but Birkenau,
designed for the specific requirements of the Auschwitz
operations, was clearly intended as the "principal camp"
in terms of inmate accomodating functions. 13
This skewing of revisionismon the part of "Holocaust"
zealots is intended to make it impossible for otherwise
intelligent people to break out of one-track,
Newspeak-imposed cognition about World War Two. Orwell:
The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium
of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper
to the devotees ... but to make all other modes of thought
The quality of demonic heresy projected onto the
revisionist witch is a product of the linguistic
technology of Newspeak which creates a deliberate blurring
of lines of distinction separatingthe literal from the
The adoption of a brand name mass-marketing sobriquet as
the official, literal-academic, as well as Pop-metaphoric
descriptionof German-Jewish relations during the National
Socialist reign,was a clever psychological and
epistemological coup on the part of the Exterminationists.
By this ruse, the critical faculties of both the masses as
well as the intelligentsia have been occluded. In
considering the subject of German-Jewish relations from
1933 to 1945, it has become difficult -- if not impossible
as, Orwell warned -- to perform the basic requirement
which ensures the integrity of language and perception,
the ability to make distinctions.
The Exterminationists exploit the confusion "Holocaust"
Newspeak has engendered in its denotative and connotative
When revisionist studies make specific challenges about,
for example, the number of Jews who perished or the
technical impossibility of gassings having taken place in
the unsealed, wooden door-latched "chambers" on display in
Auschwitz as of this writing, they are defended against in
terms of the linguistic and visual agenda of the
Pop-metaphor of "Holocaust. " Investigating any cherished
axiom is cleverly interpreted to the public as an
across-the-board, flat-earthist negation of a thousand
conjured images of body piles, goose-steppers and
concentration camp privatio n.
It is crucial to the Exterminationists that the public
failsto grasp the distinction that the Pop-metaphors of
the "Holocaust" are capable of interpretation. No
revisionist of even minimal standing denies concentration
camps, anti-Semitism or the deaths of hundreds of
thousands of Jews from disease, hunger and combat.
The objective of the "Holocaust" cult is to ensure that
thepublic does not learn that revisionist research does
not deny the Pop imagery but seeks to discover whether the
constantly repeated photographs of body piles and other
images of Jewish suffering were the result of mass murder
by poison gas and deliberate starvation or failed policies
of preventive detention and deportation stemming from
Germany's defeat in war.
Dr. Thomas Szasz excavates the underpinnings of the
confusion between the literal and the metaphoric when he
writes: " ... where the true believer speaks
metaphorically butclaims that he asserts literal truths
... heresy may consist inno more than insisting that a
metaphorical truth may be a literal falsehood. "
As a religious metaphor on a par with the mystical
utterancesof the Talmud, the 20th century Jewish
"Holocaust" hassignificance as an article of pious Jewish
faith. Recall that equally audacious recitals are a
fixture of Jewish religious fervor. In the sacred Hebrew
scripture Talmud, it is stated that the Romansslaughtered
40 million Jews during the siege of the Israelite fortress
of Bar Kokhba.
The Talmudic story, like the gas chamber story, makes for
good de laude martyrum apocrypha, but bad history. It is
nota matter for the public to debate the literal truth of
Jewish beliefs. Every religion has a right to its own
story. It only becomes a public matter when Jews attempt
to establish as criteria for human de cency, good
citizenship and public morals, the demand that non-Jews
must believe Jewish fables and accept them as a matter of
It is a telling commentary on the modern era that the
apocryphal and expiational langauge and agenda of partisan
religious dogma has been enthusiastically embraced as the
objective description of an entire epoch of world history
in public newspapers and airwaves and the lecture halls of
It is an apparent, though not widelyadmitted fact, that
Judaism, through the "Holocaust" cult, has become the
informal state religion of the West, with the distinction
of being the last truly believed religion in the otherwise
agnostic West; the end-resultof this reactionary hegemony
being the same as that of the Big Brother party in
Orwell's 1984, "to extinguish onceand for all the
possibility of independent thought. "
Judaism is of course not unique in this endeavor.
"Churchianity" and Islam have mounted similarly ambitious
undertakings, which did not prevent certain high-spirited
human beings from casting off the mental shackles of those
cruelly oppressive hoaxes. It remains to be seen if the
especially authoritative superstitions of the Church of
the "Holy Hoax" -- wedded as they are to the formidable
and unprecedented indoctrinating abilities of modern
communications technology -- will defeat or will be
defeated by the empirical investigations and doubts of the
infidels of our time, who dare to blaspheme against the
sacred logos of "Holocaust" Newspeak.
1. The Gazette (Montreal), March 2, 1985, p. B-5.
2. NY Times, Jan. 24, 1985, "Lawyer tells of ploton Barbie.
" On Feb. 26 Barbie was administered poison by the prison
physician. The NY Times described the assassination attempt
as "medication thatwas apparently given him by mistake"
( NY Times, Feb. 27,1985; also cf. The Spotlight, March
3. Israeli army radio broadcast of April 18, 1985.
4. The Sault Star (Canada), Jan. 18, 1985, p. A-11.
5. Ode to the Honourable Sir William Temple.
6. Cf. Night Battles: Witchcraft and Agrarian Cultsin the
16th and 17th Centuries.
7. Lucy S. Dawidowicz, "Lies About the Holocaust,"
Commentary, December, 1980.
8. Elie Wiesel, "What Did Happen to the Six Million?"
Jewish Chronicle, Nov. 4, 1977.
9. Dawidowicz, op. cit. , p. 34.
10. Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the 20th Century,
Institute for Historical Review, 1985, pp. 239 and 197.
11. Wiesel, op. cit. , p. 19.
12. Butz, op. cit. , p. 18.
13. Ibid., p. 52.
Author: Michael Hoffman
Title: The Psychology and Epistemology of 'Holocaust'
Source: The Journal for Historical Review
Date: Spring 1986
Issue: Volume 6 number 4
Location: Page 467
Attribution: "Reprinted from The Journal of Historical
Review, PO Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA.
Domestic subscriptions $40 per year; foreign subscriptions
$60 per year."
(Msgr. Jouin, page 24,